How Not to Write a Layoff Notice: Starbucks Case Study

Posted October 17, 2011 | Laura Christianson

I have a particularly busy week ahead and everyone in my family (me included) is coming down with a cold. Not a good combo. So I’m falling back on a blogger’s trick: I’m re-running a post from three years ago. (Yes, it’s okay to do that from time to time, as long as the topic is still relevant.)

This mini case study from Starbucks provides an excellent lesson of how NOT to write.


When Starbucks passed out pink slips to 100 workers, they called in the big guns (aka, company spokeswoman Anna Kim-Williams) to deliver the bad news.

The spokeswoman’s prepared statement said:

“Some of these partners are being offered opportunity for redeployment and others will be separated from the company.”

Partners?
Redeployment?
Separated?

Talk about a decaf statement!

The “partners” she refers to are human resources and security workers.

And “redeployment”? Give me a (coffee) break! Are these “partners” in the Army? Why didn’t she just say, “the workers might be transferred”?

“Separated from the company.” We all know what that means. Laid off. Axed. You’re outta here!

I can understand Starbucks attempting to soften the blow and call as little public attention to the layoffs as possible. But let’s swallow the bitter coffee: Starbucks employees have known for months that they might get laid off. The public has known for weeks that the layoffs were coming. So add a double shot to my vanilla latte and tell it like it is:

We’re sorry to announce that we laid off 100 workers. When the economy improves, some of them may eventually be reassigned to other departments, but most of these folks are dead wood, so they’re outta here.

To heap even more verbose pain and suffering on the laid-off employees (excuse me–partners), the head of human resources (check out his cool job title below) sent the following memo to them:

A Message from Chet Kuchinad: Workforce Reduction in Partner Resources and Partner & Asset Protection

Dear Partners,

As we communicated on January 28, Starbucks is reshaping our operating model and organization structure to ensure the long-term health of our business. This includes the difficult but necessary decision to reduce our global workforce.

As part of our commitment to transparency throughout this process, we wanted to inform you that approximately 100 non-store partners (including Partner Resources and Partner & Asset Protection) are being notified today that their positions have been eliminated. About 40 of those partners are located at the Starbucks Support Center (SSC) in Seattle.

You may be wondering why these groups are being notified this week if we have not yet notified other displaced partners. PRO and P&AP have unique responsibilities supporting internal client groups during a workforce reduction. Due to the organizational changes in these groups, we felt it respectful to inform these partners now, prior to our broader notification day in mid-February. For partners in a few international markets, this may be somewhat later in order to comply with local employment laws.

We are thankful and proud of the contributions our partners make to the organization, and we are committed to treating all partners with respect and dignity — those who are departing Starbucks and those who will stay.

We recognize this period of uncertainty is unsettling for all partners. We commit to communicating openly with partners as soon as we are able.

Regards,
Chet Kuchinad,
evp, Partner Resource

Well. I certainly feel unsettled. Does Chet honestly believe he’s communicating in English, or is he practicing some internal Starbucksese (similar to Vulcan…or Klingon?).

Here’s your latte challenge, readers:

In the Comments area of this post, re-write Chet’s memo in plain English. Try to condense his 236-word statement to 50 words or less.

Have at it!

Source:
“Starbucks Lays off 100 Office Workers,” by Melissa Allison, Seattle Times, Feb 5, 2009.

Return to Posts

5 responses to “How Not to Write a Layoff Notice: Starbucks Case Study”

  1. Marti Pieper says:

    The mochas still come steamy
    And the lattes, they still foam
    But the money, it’s not rolling
    Are they making Joe at home?

    Soon a hundred of our number
    Will espresso out the door.
    Forty first and sixty later
    Won’t do Starbucks any more.

  2. Marti Pieper says:

    The mochas still come steamy
    And the lattes, they still foam
    But the money, it’s not rolling
    Are they making Joe at home?

    Soon a hundred of our number
    Will espresso out the door.
    Forty first and sixty later
    Won’t do Starbucks any more.

  3. Cheryl says:

    Starbucks does have its own jargon, which employees would understand. But here is my attempt:

    “Economic conditions force us to reduce staff: 100 human resources and security staff received notice today. In Seattle, the Support Center will lose 40 who must first assist others being laid off this month.
    We commit to treating all staff with respect and dignity during this process.”

  4. Cheryl says:

    Starbucks does have its own jargon, which employees would understand. But here is my attempt:

    “Economic conditions force us to reduce staff: 100 human resources and security staff received notice today. In Seattle, the Support Center will lose 40 who must first assist others being laid off this month.
    We commit to treating all staff with respect and dignity during this process.”

  5. excusemydust says:

    Thanks for the amusing slice of American business euphemisms at their best. And as an follow up, the above noted Starbucks “communication specialists” Anna-Kim Williams and Chet Kuchinad, you would think would be out on the streets after such public and disgraceful missteps, but both belong to that illustrious club “how to succeed at business without even trying” and have gone on to bigger and better jobs. Just goes to show you, in Seattle’s competitive market, it’s not what u know or how good of a job u do – sometimes just a warm body will do! Way to go guys! How to make the most of the little skills you have.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *